Is Hamlet a Parasite to Women?

Spoiler alert: Do not read this if you haven’t finished the play.                                                                                 

If you have read the play Hamlet, you will notice that the women around Hamlet become tragic figures. For instance, Hamlet’s mother, Gertrude, and Hamlet’s lover, Ophelia, all face tragic deaths. Therefore, I am here to analyze if Hamlet symbolizes a parasite to women. I will first focus on Gertrude who is considered to be one of the most significant people in Hamlet’s life. Gertrude is described my Hamlet as a “beast” who “post[ed] / with such dexterity to incestuous sheets” (11). Hamlet plays a moral judge who criticizes his mother with extreme words. His sharp and caustic thoughts toward women made me ponder if Hamlet served as a parasite to his mother. For instance, he verbally attacks his mother by saying “you question with a wicked tongue” which conveys his antagonistic feelings for her (72). His harsh words hurt her emotional state so much that she exclaims “O, speak to me no more./ These words like daggers enter in my ears” (75). Hamlet almost seems to be psychologically killing his mother through these painful words. Yet, one must argue that Gertrude’s death is the strongest evidence to support that Hamlet is a parasite to women. Gertrude dies after drinking the poisoned drink that was intended for Hamlet during the bloody fight. She states to Hamlet before sipping the poisoned drink, “Here’s to thy health” (118). The fact that the drink was intended for Hamlet indicates the harmful effect he has on his closed ones specifically women. Moreover, it is thought-provoking that the queen is killed by drinking poison. When she consumed the poison, the inside of her body started to degrade and destroy itself. Another individual deeply impacted by Hamlet’s parasitical nature is Ophelia. Ophelia is the lover of Hamlet who is spurned and abandoned by him. Hamlet says hateful and painful words to her during their break-up scene. For instance, he says “I loved you not” and calls her a “jig”, “amble”, and “lisp” (55). As a result of Hamlet’s cruel speech, Ophelia dejectedly declares “O, woe is me” (56). She is further tortured and wounded by Hamlet when she learns that he has killed her father, Polonius. Therefore, she goes mad. During her mad state, she sings several songs on how Hamlet betrayed her. For instance, she sings “Before you tumbled me,/ You promised me to wed” which refers to Hamlet’s lie that he would marry her (88). Also, Ophelia constantly carries flowers which are symbolic of her mental state. She carries daisies and violets which respectively represent unhappy love and faithfulness. Obviously, these particular flowers connect to Hamlet reiterating the point that he has destroyed her life. Like Gertrude, Ophelia faces a tragic end when she drowns. It is uncertain whether she kills herself or had an accident near the “glassy stream” (100). Nevertheless, Ophelia loses her life which was full of innocence, purity, and love. It can be said that Hamlet took away her precious life supporting the point that he is a parasite to women. Even though I’m basically criticizing Hamlet here, I do know that he is extremely guilty about it. His parasitical nature might just be his fate.

Who is Hamlet?

One must ask when reading the play Hamlet, who is Hamlet? Is he the villain or the good guy? Is he a tragic hero? Is he mad? Unfortunately, the play allows each reader to develop its own opinion. Therefore, I will be speaking about my opinion regarding Hamlet’s identity. I believe that Hamlet is intellectual, cunning, condescending, morally judgmental, immature, and crazy. I know my interpretation is extremely negative but I can’t help feel that Hamlet is very misguided. I admit that he will always be the smartest guy in the room but he doesn’t need to be so pompous. For instance, he boldly makes the statement, “frailty, thy name is woman” which is directed to his own mother and other women in general (11). Who is he to judge the whole woman population? He acts like a moral judge which can also be interpreted as Hamlet thinking that he is God. God is known to be the moral judge of humanity not a Denmark prince. Also, I thought it was presumptuous for Hamlet to lecture on the players regarding acting. He states that certain players “imitated humanity so abominably” which is pretty ironic (58). Hamlet is the one who is on the mission of acting crazy. In other words, he is like an actor too because he conceals his true self. Hamlet is lying to himself and eventually becomes consumed by this act. Apparently, he is pretending to be “mad” but I actually think that he is legitimately mad. For instance, he makes this sinister statement, “his soul may be as damn’d and black” which is about his decision to damn Claudius into hell (71). His plan to kill the King at a moment of vulnerability seems sinister and cruel. Moreover, he seems mad when he ominously states “O, from this time forth,/ My thoughts be bloody, or be nothing worth” (86). He is willing to become violent to fulfill his supposed destiny. (Killing Polonius was not part of the revenge plan he had.) Lastly, I think that Hamlet is immature and stubborn. He was so rude and callous during the play at Act III. He relentlessly insulted Ophelia by making vulgar statements that obviously hurt her deeply. (We must remember that they had just recently broken up.) Hamlet seems to take advantage of their breakup to torture Ophelia. He was probably upset with Ophelia because she was not “honest” and “fair” to him (54). Like a child, he insults Ophelia by making these statements that allude to their past relationship. I just cannot bring myself to respect Hamlet because he is inconsiderate and impolite. After he learns of his father’s murder, he becomes so bitter, emotionally driven, and crazy. What if the ghost of Hamlet’s father was actually the devil? The ghost drove him to take extreme measures which might damn him to hell. Could Hamlet have been saved if the ghost had not appeared? Regardless of my opinion of Hamlet, I do believe that he has the right to avenge his father’s death but I would recommend a revenge employing the justice system.

Dr. Blesdoe is a Hypocrite!

As I began reading Invisible Man, I quickly noticed a certain character, Dr. Blesdoe. Dr. Blesdoe is the president of the university that the narrator attends and is a greatly respected individual in this society. In the beginning, the narrator views Dr. Blesdoe as a role model he aspires to become. He even states that Dr. Blesdoe “was the example of everything I hoped to be: Influential with wealthy men all over the country, consulted in matters concerning the race; a leader of the people; the possessor of not one, but two Cadillacs, a good salary and a soft, good-looking and creamy complexioned wife” (101). In my opinion, Dr. Blesdoe seems a bit superficial probably due to his possessions and immense power. As I read more of the novel, I realized the true nature of Dr. Blesdoe. Dr. Blesdoe is a hypocrite! He is a conniving, selfish, and ambitious individual who will take extreme measures to maintain his status and power. We get a first glimpse of Dr. Blesdoe’s true nature when he learns that the narrator took Mr. Norton to the slave- quarter section. Dr. Blesdoe gets extremely angered by this fact that he passionately exclaims to the narrator, “Haven’t you the sense God gave a dog? We take these white folks where we want them to go, we show them what we want them to see.” (102). His revelation reveals his superficial and insincere character. He is basically admitting that he is acting to be someone else in order to get what he wants. He even has this ability to put on a mask to conceal his inner emotions. He acts as a wise leader of the African- American race when in reality he is not.  Therefore, he is a hypocrite. He is secretly a manipulative person which the narrator catches on. For example, the narrator states that Dr. Blesdoe “demanded that everyone attend” these chapel meetings which focused on inciting hope for the college students (115). It is later inferred that Dr. Blesdoe forces this activity on his students to appear as an individual who believes in them. In reality, Dr. Blesdoe manipulates this meeting in order to prove to the white leaders that he is a powerful and intelligent man. He doesn’t care about the students. He even says, “I’ll have every Negro in the country hanging on tree limbs by morning if it means staying where I am” (141).  What kind of person says these kinds of horrible things? Can you imagine what the narrator must feel when his role model bluntly says this to him? I greatly dislike Dr. Blesdoe because he is a liar who even lies to himself. He decides to ignore the world around him in order to advance himself in the power hierarchy. He has no intention of helping the African- American students because apparently he is “the king down here” who cannot be stopped (141). He seriously needs to get over himself. I hope Dr. Blesdoe gets what he deserves.

Dissection of the Prologue in Invisible Man

Currently, I am reading a novel called Invisible Man which is written by Ralph Ellison. As I read the prologue of the novel, I came to an understanding of the whole book. I believe the prologue was incorporated in order to depict and firmly state the narrator’s state of mind.  In the beginning of the prologue, the narrator quotes “I am an invisible man.” (3). When I think of the word “invisible”, I first come up with the meaning of not being seen. Therefore, it seems likely to me that the narrator is metaphorically referring himself as “invisible” in order to convey his thought that no one really SEES him. However, I know that the word “invisible” can mean other things as well. Hence, I searched the word “invisible” with the Merriam Webster Dictionary. I found that the word “invisible” can mean incapable by nature of being seen, hidden, imperceptible, and not being reflected in statistics. Surprisingly, all these definitions of this particular word all fit within the prologue. For instance, the meaning of incapable of being seen can be applied with what the narrator says in the beginning of the prologue. He states that when people approach him “they see only my surrounding, themselves, or figments of their imagination-indeed, everything and anything except me” (3). In other words, the narrator is stating that it is inherent for people to be unable to really look and see others. People are so caught up with their own lives and thoughts that it is impossible for them to really look into a person’s true self. Secondly, the definition of hidden and imperceptible can also be found in the prologue. For example, the narrator mentions how he has “been carrying a fight with Monopolated Light & Power” (5). This particular fight is discovered to be an imperceptible and hidden one because the company fails to notice its enemy, the narrator. The narrator has been secretly draining the company’s power with his “1,369 lights” which correlates with the definition of “invisible” (7). The narrator is hidden and imperceptible to the eyes of the Light & Power Company. Lastly, the definition of not being reflected in statistics appears when the narrator recounts the event when he beat up a white man. His beating of the man was featured in the Daily News which the narrator scoffs at by exclaiming “poor fool, poor blind fool, I thought with sincere compassion, mugged by an invisible man!” (5). In this context, the word “invisible” means  not being reflected in statistics since the news story only covered the victim’s picture and description and not the actual mugger. Essentially, the narrator hopes to convey his real identity, invisibility. The narrator is rather proud that he is invisible because he doesn’t need to care about his appearance or his surroundings. He values truth which is why he possesses “1,369 lights” in his home. He even states that “The truth is light and light is the truth.” which emphasizes his appreciation for truth (7). I believe that this novel is going to be about the importance of truth and reality.

Hamlet's View on Women and Its Impact on His Future

In class, we have briefly discussed about Hamlet’s views toward women. So far only two women, Queen Gertrude and Ophelia, have stood out as the significant women in Hamlet’s life. Therefore, we will first analyze Hamlet’s views on Gertrude, his mother. We have learned in the beginning of the play that Gertrude committed incest by marrying Hamlet’s uncle. (In the Elizabethan Era, marrying one’s brother-in-law was condemned as incest.) Hence, Hamlet looks down on his mother and morally judges her in a negative manner. For instance, he sarcastically remarks to his mother “Ay, madam, it is common” (9). The word “common” connotes vulgarity in this context so Hamlet uses this particular diction to express his disdain for her. In other words, Hamlet is calling his mother vulgar and sinful. Moreover, he attacks his mother’s character by passionately exclaiming “Frailty, thy name is woman” (11). Hamlet disapproves of his mother because she shows weakness in character and judgment. He even manages to call her a “beast” that is illogical and “wicked” (11). It seems very unusual that Hamlet has such negative feelings for his mother despite the fact that they are related by flesh and blood. In my opinion, Hamlet’s rejection of his own kin foreshadows a disruption within his state of mind. He is suddenly overcome with such intense and harsh emotions toward his mother that he fails to maintain his sanity. By focusing only on the negative aspects of his life, Hamlet will most likely be driven to obsession of revenge and disregard for all other women. Speaking of other women, Ophelia seems like a very important individual to Hamlet. We know that Hamlet and Ophelia are lovers but we are not aware of the depth of their relationship. Nevertheless, it seems that Hamlet has a good opinion towards Ophelia but I sense an emptiness/doubt in their relationship. I noticed that Hamlet does not speak or think of Ophelia during the whole first act. Yet, I do not doubt that there SEEMS to be an affection between them. For instance, Ophelia has stated that Hamlet “made many tenders/Of his affection” to her which confirms their relationship (18). However, I still cannot suppress this feeling of doubt over Hamlet’s affection for Ophelia. He has already made his opinion clear on women when he quoted “Frailty, thy name is woman”. Also, what will happen when Hamlet learns that Ophelia will not speak to him because of her father’s command? Will he condemn her as a weak woman for following her father’s orders? (I think Ophelia’s father knows about Claudius’s sins which will further exacerbate Hamlet’s opinions toward Ophelia.) I predict that Hamlet will be disappointed with Ophelia’s obedience to Claudius’s right hand man that he will be driven more to seek revenge. He might feel that he has been rejected by all the people he previously loved, Gertrude and Ophelia. Therefore, he might think all blame goes to Claudius deepening his dangerous obsession. It seems evident to me that Hamlet’s views on women will worsen. Without a woman’s love (motherly or romantic), Hamlet be unable to control his reckless actions and thoughts.

Who is Gertrude?

                In class, we discussed Queen Gertrude, Hamlet’s mother and Claudius’ new bride. Many of my classmates expressed their opinions on Queen Gertrude which was either positive or negative. Therefore, I am here to analyze both sides. First I am going to focus on the positive/good Gertrude. There is this theory that Queen Gertrude only got married to Claudius to protect Hamlet. We know that Claudius is a suspicious and shady character because he married his sister-in-law. Also, he is shown to be antagonistic towards Hamlet by stating to him that “to persever/ in obstinate condolement is a course? Of impious stubbornness: tis unmanly grief” (9). He is basically telling Hamlet that he is just an immature boy who is unnecessarily stubborn. Therefore, Queen Gertrude might have known Claudius’ ill feelings towards Hamlet that she married him to protect her son. She seems worried that her son will lose his life like the late king that she begs Hamlet, “I pray thee, stay with us; go not to Wittenberg” (10). It can be viewed by some people that Gertrude is sacrificing herself depicting her as a strong and heroic individual. Lastly, some might point out Hamlet’s first soliloquy which describes Gertrude’s overflowing grief on King Hamlet’s death. She is said to “have follow’d [Hamlet’s] poor father’s body,/Like Niobe, all tears” which appears as a sincere gesture (11). Her strong emotional response to the King’s death portrays her as a morally good and devoted wife. Yet, the others view Gertrude as a morally corrupt individual by also pointing out Hamlet’s first soliloquy. Hamlet states that “within a month….she married. O, most wicked speed, to post/with such dexterity to incestuous sheets!” (11). Through Hamlet’s revelation, we learn that Gertrude married Claudius, her brother-in-law after only one month after her first husband’s death. To some, her action indicates duplicity and incites suspicions in people’s minds. Did Gertrude only marry Claudius to maintain her position as queen? Was there an affair between Claudius and Gertrude in the past? It seems quite suspicious and abnormal that she married a family member at such speed knowing that she is committing incest. Also, her deliberate disapproval and disregard for Hamlet’s mourning seems cruel. She coldly states to Hamlet, “all that lives must die/ Passing through nature and eternity” (9) which is an unkind gesture to Hamlet’s fragile emotional state. However, I have come to the conclusion that Gertrude is actually a morally good person. I believe that she married Claudius in order to protect her son, the immediate person to the throne of Denmark. She is sacrificing herself and playing the role of a happy wife to preserve her loved ones. She is also a rather alert and wise individual because she quickly married Claudius fully knowing the dangers that could have claimed Hamlet’s life. She threw away her honor, pride, and body to protect her son. (Unfortunately, Hamlet fails to understand his mother’s actions.) But who am I to judge? I just only read two scenes of the first act.

R.I.P Quxxn

       

Bells for John Whiteside’s Daughter

John Crow Ransom

There was such speed in her little body,   

And such lightness in her footfall,   

It is no wonder her brown study

Astonishes us all.

Her wars were bruited in our high window.   

We looked among orchard trees and beyond   

Where she took arms against her shadow,   

Or harried unto the pond

The lazy geese, like a snow cloud

Dripping their snow on the green grass,   

Tricking and stopping, sleepy and proud,   

Who cried in goose, Alas,

For the tireless heart within the little   

Lady with rod that made them rise

From their noon apple-dreams and scuttle   

Goose-fashion under the skies!

But now go the bells, and we are ready,   

In one house we are sternly stopped

To say we are vexed at her brown study,   

Lying so primly propped.

               Over the winter break, I was informed of tragic news that astonished me greatly. My favorite Youtuber, who was called Quxxn, passed away. I was so shocked by this unfortunate and tragic news that I was in daze for some time. It was hard to believe that such an energetic and happy person could be gone forever and never to return. As a result, I often think about Quxxn which led me to discover a poem that reminds me of her. The poem “Bells for John Whiteside’s Daughter” by John Crowe Ransom seems to relate to Quxxn’s passing. First, the title “Bells for John Whiteside’s Daughter” reminds me of Quxxn in a bittersweet way. The speaker of the poem obviously is not well acquainted with John Whiteside’s daughter because he doesn’t even know her name. I, too, don’t even know Quxxn’s real name and life story. I just know that she was a young woman who loved playing The Sims and enjoyed life. Yet, both the speaker and I share a bittersweet feeling for the deceased ones. Even though we don’t know these individuals, we feel sad over their passing because they remain so alive in our memories. For instance, the speaker of the poem reminisces about “such speed in [the little girl’s] little body” and the “lightness in her foot fall” (Line 1-2). By emphasizing lively diction such as “speed” and “foot fall”, the speaker is attempting to depict his memories of the girl as positive and sweet (Line 1-2).. Through this emphasis, we can understand the poet’s astonishment and sadness over the girl’s sudden death. Like the speaker, I am saddened by Quxxn’s passing because I am bombarded with memories of her upbeat and friendly personality. Her videos always started with a happy introduction which depicted her as an energetic and cheerful person so it comes as a surprise that I can never see or hear her voice anymore. However, the speaker and I have realized that death is a natural part of life that we must accept. Therefore, “we are ready” to accept her “brown study” (Line 17-18). (Brown study according to The Free Dictionary means a state of deep thought which represents death in this poem.) The poem definitely discusses a great theme on life which I consider AP Lit merit. As we live our lives, we will be faced with deaths of people who are close to us or slightly acquainted with. It is perfectly normal to grieve for the dead but it is our duty to move on with our lives. We cannot be frozen in a moment that is full of sorrow and regret. Humans are destined to live their lives at full potential. Finally, I can predict that some will argue that the speaker of the poem is indifferent and harsh towards the little girl’s death given that he does not know her name. Yet, I see the speaker’s positive and lively descriptions of the little girl such as “tireless heart within the little/Lady” as an indication of his affection and appreciation for her (Line 13-14).